Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JUNE 2021

Professor Sovern's Opt-in Arbitration Proposal Is Neither New Nor Supportable

Ballard Spahr LLP
Ballard Spahr LLP
Contributor
Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP, an AmLaw 100 law firm with 19 US offices, serves clients in more than 50...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ballard Spahr LLP

Professor Jeff Sovern recently proposed that the CFPB issue a supposedly "new" arbitration rule "that prevents companies from blocking consumers...

United StatesConsumer Protection

Professor Jeff Sovern recently proposed that the CFPB issue a supposedly "new" arbitration rule "that prevents companies from blocking consumers from suing in court unless consumers specifically opted in to the arbitration clause" after being given a CFPB-mandated disclosure that if they do not sign and their rights are violated, they "may still sue us in court or later agree to arbitration." In truth, there is nothing "new" about this proposal. It is just the latest spin on the decades-old argument by consumer advocates that arbitration agreements should only be entered into after a dispute has occurred, not before, because consumers are not fully cognizant of their rights until then.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from