Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 OCTOBER 2017

FACTA Suit Dismissed For Lack Of Harm

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

A Florida court recently broke with other district courts in its circuit when it concluded that a plaintiff lacks standing to sue a defendant for mere technical violation of the FACTA unless the plaintiff has been harmed

United StatesConsumer Protection

A Florida court recently broke with other district courts in its circuit when it concluded that a plaintiff lacks standing to sue a defendant for mere technical violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) unless the plaintiff has been harmed. FACTA prohibits printing more than the last five digits of a credit card number or the expiration date on a receipt. In the case in question (Gesten v. Burger King Corp.) the plaintiff alleged that Burger King violated FACTA when it provided him with a receipt which identified his payment method as a debit card, identified the issuing company (e.g., Visa, American Express), and included the first six and last four digits of his account number.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from