Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2019

$8.4 Million In Attorneys' Fees Requested In TCPA Settlement

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

The original suit, filed in December 2015, accused Alarm.com of Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations ...

United StatesConsumer Protection

Telemarketing saga ends with a demand for one-third of the fund

Scofflaw, I Say!

Abante Rooter and Plumbing Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc. went right down to the wire.

The original suit, filed in December 2015, accused Alarm.com of Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations, including recorded calls and calls made from autodialers. Some of the calls were made to consumers on the National Do Not Call Registry. Wrapped up in the suit was one of Alarm.com's "service providers," Alliance Security. You may remember Alliance in its earlier incarnation as VMS.

No matter the name, the company has had numerous run-ins with TCPA charges, including plenty of attention from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (see our earlier story here). Although Alarm.com was the only named defendant, Alliance was accused of making the offending calls on its behalf to two separate classes of phone owners. The suit contains a comprehensive list of Alliance's legal run-ins under

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from