Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2015

StubHub To Ticketmaster: Don’t Block Our Sales

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Explore more from Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

On March 29, 2015, StubHub, Inc. brought an antitrust action against the Golden State Warriors LLC (the "Warriors") and Ticketmaster, L.L.C. ("Ticketmaster"), alleging that they monopolized the ticket resale market ..

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Melissa Ginsberg
Melissa Ginsberg
Deirdre McEvoy
Deirdre McEvoy

On March 29, 2015, StubHub, Inc. brought an antitrust action against the Golden State Warriors LLC (the "Warriors") and Ticketmaster, L.L.C. ("Ticketmaster"), alleging that they monopolized the ticket resale market by forcing Warriors fans to use only secondary ticket exchange services provided by the Warriors, and excluding competing secondary ticket exchange services.  The action is pending before the Honorable Vince Chhabria in the Northern District of California.  You can read the complaint here.

The Action

The action alleges that the Warriors possess a monopoly over the sale of "primary" or "first sale" Warriors tickets, all of which are sold through Ticketmaster.  Warriors fans can only purchase season passes through Ticketmaster.  In addition, StubHub contends that the Warriors have cancelled or threatened to cancel ticket subscriptions to Warriors season and post-season tickets if fans resell their Warriors tickets over a secondary ticketing exchange that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Right To Repair Alert: Deere & Company Reaches Settlement With FTC, States

The Federal Trade Commission and five State Attorneys General have reached a landmark settlement with Deere & Company in a year-and-a-half antitrust litigation over the agricultural equipment manufacturer's restrictions on repair resources. The stipulated order, if approved, will require Deere to provide farmers and independent repair providers with the same repair tools and technical resources available to authorized dealers for a period of ten years.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ruling Signals Widening Antitrust Exposure For Hospital Contracting Practices

A federal court ruling against New York Presbyterian Hospital validates DOJ theories that market power can be proven through supracompetitive pricing rather than market share alone, and that exclusionary conduct is not required for antitrust claims. This decision expands potential antitrust exposure for hospital systems employing restrictive contracting practices like all-products provisions, anti-tiering terms, and gag clauses...
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

Life Sciences Antitrust Quarterly Update Q3 2026

This quarterly update examines key antitrust developments in life sciences during Q3 2026, including the FTC's investigation of Boston Scientific's $14.5 billion Penumbra acquisition, the DOJ's record $250 million HSR penalty against KKR, and European regulatory actions involving Sanofi and Align Technology. The analysis also explores the UK's pro-innovation approach to healthcare AI regulation and its implications for the medical device industry.
GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law
Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP