Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 APRIL 2008

Resale Price Maintenance Programs Still At Risk

District court case could affect implementation of minimum resale price maintenance programs.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Joel Chefitz
Joel Chefitz
Lawrence Fox
Lawrence Fox
Joseph Winterscheid
Joseph Winterscheid
Author LinkedIn connections

District court case could affect implementation of minimum resale price maintenance programs.

Sellers must still exercise great caution when designing minimum resale price programs for their resellers in the United States following the recently settled New York v. Herman Miller, Inc. case.  This is despite the Supreme Court of the United States' landmark ruling just last year in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. that minimum resale price maintenance (MRPM) programs are no longer illegal per se but are to be evaluated under the Rule of Reason by weighing their anticompetitive harm against their pro-competitive benefits. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from