Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2023

Recent FTC Merger Settlement Signals Increased Antitrust Agency Concerns About Coordination From Competitor Entanglements

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

In September 2022, natural gas producer EQT Corporation (EQT) announced that it agreed to acquire certain Appalachian Basin natural gas assets from rival Quantum Energy Partners (Quantum)...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Key Takeaways

  • An FTC merger settlement in the $5.2 billion transaction between EQT and Quantum, two producers of natural gas in the Appalachian Basin, signals the antitrust agencies' new approach to analyzing the potential for coordination by examining touchpoints between merging parties and competitors.
  • Importantly the FTC conducted a full-scale investigation of the transaction's potential substantive impact on direct competition between the parties and cleared the transaction. Yet the FTC obtained a settlement to resolve concerns about ongoing entanglements between the two companies.
  • The FTC settlement has three key features, each of which stakes out aggressive positions that may not have held up had the merging parties litigated them in court. The FTC settlement: (1) alleged a violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Act's prohibition against interlocking directorates that extends beyond existing precedent; (2) advanced an untested theory that Quantum—which

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from