Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MARCH 2016

Potential Antitrust Implications Of Most Favored Nation Clauses

When the effect or intent of using an MFN clause may be to limit competition or preclude competition by a competitor, a closer look at the MFN clause is warranted.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Both in the automotive and other industries, parties have turned to most favored nation (MFN) clauses—or clauses having the same effect—as a means to assure the lowest possible input costs. MFN clauses offer pro-competitive, cost-saving benefits including efficiencies in negotiations; buyers need not haggle for the last nickel in cost reduction when an MFN clause guarantees the best available price. Despite these pro-competitive benefits, MFN clauses have drawn increased scrutiny for their possible misuse and potential for creating antitrust exposure.

DOJ's Growing Concerns

Our last article regarding MFN pricing provisions reviewed the growing debate among antitrust practitioners over whether such provisions are pro-competitive or anticompetitive. We noted the Department of Justice Antitrust Division's (DOJ) concerns over such provisions when imposed by a buyer with a large market share. Indeed, the DOJ had filed several antitrust actions alleging that particular

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from