The past several decades have seen a surge in trade deals,
technology advancements and logistical developments that have
culminated in the most liberalized markets in history.
Today’s economies are inextricably interdependent. Businesses
reach across hemispheres. Raw materials and component products
cross numerous boundaries before making their way into the hands of
end consumers. This puts arbitrators of antitrust laws in a
quandary: how deep into foreign territory can their laws reach in
order to protect fair competition at home?
This article discusses efforts to settle the boundaries of
American and European antitrust regimes, and the unresolved matters
that linger. It first explores the way American courts identify
‘import commerce’ subject to the Sherman Act when
defendants are foreign participants in globalized supply chains. It
then turns to the European Union’s (EU) expanding approach to
enforcement of foreign conduct, and its increasingly