Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2019

DOJ Withdraws From 2013 Joint Statement With PTO On Frand Injunctions

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

In November 2017, Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Makan Delrahim reignited a debate about antitrust enforcement in the context of SSOs, standard essential patents (SEPs), and agreements to price SEPs on FRAND terms.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

INTRODUCTION

In November 2017, Assistant Attorney General (AAG) Makan Delrahim reignited a debate about antitrust enforcement in the context of standard-setting organizations (SSOs),1 standard essential patents (SEPs), and agreements to price SEPs on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND)2 terms. Prior to the Trump administration, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had taken similar approaches—with both agencies expressing concerns about the competitive implications of patent holders that had made FRAND commitments obtaining injunctive relief to exclude willing licensees. AAG Delrahim, over the last year, has moved DOJ in a direction that allows SEP holders more freedom to use the exclusionary potential of those patents. DOJ also has redirected its focus toward the conduct of licensees and the SSOs themselves.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from