Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2026

DOJ Settlement With Agri Stats And Recent Speech Signal Heightened Scrutiny For Information Sharing Among Competitors And Algorithmic Pricing Tools

Wiggin and Dana LLP
Wiggin and Dana LLP
Contributor
Wiggin and Dana LLP

Wiggin and Dana LLP

Wiggin and Dana is a full-service law firm of highly talented, creative and experienced lawyers...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wiggin and Dana LLP

The Department of Justice's recent settlement with Agri Stats and remarks by Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Daniel Glad signal a new era of heightened antitrust scrutiny for companies sharing competitively...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division recently announced a proposed settlement with Agri Stats, Inc. regarding allegations that Agri Stats unlawfully helped meat processors exchange competitively sensitive information.1 The settlement, filed in the District of Minnesota, requires Agri Stats to halt certain data-sharing practices that the DOJ alleges suppressed competition and increased meat prices.2

In its suit, the DOJ alleged that Agri Stats collected detailed information from meat processors and shared that data through granular reports.3 The DOJ alleged this access to non-public information allowed competitors to align their pricing and production decisions.4 This competitor data-sharing was a “red flag” for competitive harm, according to Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed A. Assefi.5

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from