Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MAY 2025

Antitrust Compliance For North Carolina Construction Companies: Avoiding Legal Pitfalls

Ward and Smith, P.A
Explore more from Ward and Smith, P.A

For construction company owners and managers, understanding antitrust laws and implementing effective compliance measures isn't just good business practice...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Isabelle M. Chammas
Isabelle M. Chammas
E. Bradley Evans
E. Bradley Evans

The construction industry has long been a target for antitrust enforcement.

For construction company owners and managers, understanding antitrust laws and implementing effective compliance measures isn't just good business practice, it's essential protection against potentially devastating legal consequences.

Why Antitrust Matters in Construction

Antitrust laws are designed to protect consumers and the competitive marketplace from behaviors that restrict competition or trade. They apply to businesses of all sizes, including construction companies, and carry serious penalties for violations.

The construction industry faces particular scrutiny for several reasons. The project-based nature of the business creates numerous opportunities for competitors to interact on bids and contracts. The prevalence of subcontractor relationships often blurs the lines between competitors and partners. Local trade associations often bring competitors together, creating

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Right To Repair Alert: Deere & Company Reaches Settlement With FTC, States

The Federal Trade Commission and five State Attorneys General have reached a landmark settlement with Deere & Company in a year-and-a-half antitrust litigation over the agricultural equipment manufacturer's restrictions on repair resources. The stipulated order, if approved, will require Deere to provide farmers and independent repair providers with the same repair tools and technical resources available to authorized dealers for a period of ten years.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ruling Signals Widening Antitrust Exposure For Hospital Contracting Practices

A federal court ruling against New York Presbyterian Hospital validates DOJ theories that market power can be proven through supracompetitive pricing rather than market share alone, and that exclusionary conduct is not required for antitrust claims. This decision expands potential antitrust exposure for hospital systems employing restrictive contracting practices like all-products provisions, anti-tiering terms, and gag clauses...
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

Life Sciences Antitrust Quarterly Update Q3 2026

This quarterly update examines key antitrust developments in life sciences during Q3 2026, including the FTC's investigation of Boston Scientific's $14.5 billion Penumbra acquisition, the DOJ's record $250 million HSR penalty against KKR, and European regulatory actions involving Sanofi and Align Technology. The analysis also explores the UK's pro-innovation approach to healthcare AI regulation and its implications for the medical device industry.
GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law
Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
Article

After Learning Resources: Liquidation, Protests, And IEEPA Tariff Refunds

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced October 6, 2026, as the launch date for Phase 3 of its IEEPA tariff refund system, allowing plaintiffs with Court of International Trade reliquidation orders to submit older entries for processing. This development follows the Supreme Court's decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, which invalidated the IEEPA tariffs, but the refund process depends on complex customs liquidation rules...
United StatesInternational Law
Ward and Smith, P.A
Ward and Smith, P.A
Article

Trump Administration’s New Section 301 Tariffs Reach Nearly All U.S. Imports

On July 23, 2026, the Office of the United States Trade Representative imposed new Section 301 tariffs on imports from 60 trading partners, affecting approximately 99.4% of U.S. imports. The tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5% depending on the country, aim to pressure foreign governments to strengthen controls on forced-labor imports, with different calculation methods for the European Union, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, and Switzerland. The action creates significant implications for U.S. supply chains, with
United StatesInternational Law
Ward and Smith, P.A
Ward and Smith, P.A
Article

Water Rates Are Becoming The Next Utility Affordability Flashpoint

Water utility bills are rising faster than electricity rates across America, driven by aging infrastructure, stricter regulations, and system consolidations. This analysis examines why investor-owned water utilities in North Carolina are experiencing accelerating rate increases and explores the legal, economic, and affordability challenges facing regulators and low-income households.
United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources
Ward and Smith, P.A
Ward and Smith, P.A