Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MAY 2011

Too Late To Claim

Upholding an arbitration award, the English High Court held that it did not matter which of the two contractual trigger dates came first to start the time limitation period running.

United KingdomTransport
Lyall Hickson
Lyall Hickson

Upholding an arbitration award, the English High Court held that it did not matter which of the two contractual trigger dates came first to start the time limitation period running.

The issue examined by the arbitral tribunal and the High Court in X v Y1 revolved around whether, under the contractual terms of the charterparty, the arbitration claim was out of time.

In a consecutive voyage charterparty (CVCP), the parties had agreed to bring all demurrage claims under a modified Centrocon arbitration clause "within 12 months of final discharge or termination of this Charterparty".

The claimant, X, argued that a demurrage claim relating to the first of three voyages under the CVCP was time-barred 12 months after the date of the first discharge. Disagreeing, the defendant, Y, argued that it had until 12 months after the date of termination of the charterparty to present its demurrage claim. The arbitrator agreed with Y and X appealed to the English High Court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from