Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2017

The "LONGCHAMP" – Supreme Court Ruling

The "LONGCHAMP" – Supreme Court: Hijacked vessel costs incurred during negotiations fall within Rule F of the York-Antwerp Rules 1974

United KingdomTransport

The "LONGCHAMP" – Supreme Court: Hijacked vessel costs incurred during negotiations fall within Rule F of the York-Antwerp Rules 1974

Last week, by a 4-1 majority, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal in Mitsui & Co Ltd & Ors v Beteiligungsgesellschaft LPG Tankerflotte MBH & Co KG & Anor (2017) holding that vessel-operating expenses incurred in negotiating a piracy ransom fell within Rule F of the York-Antwerp Rules 1974 as alternative expenses.

On 29 January 2009, the LPG carrier "LONGCHAMP" was on a voyage between Norway and Vietnam when she was taken by Somali pirates and diverted to Eyl, Somalia. In the weeks following capture, the owners negotiated the ransom demand down from the initial demand of US$6m to US$1.85m, which was paid around two months after the ship's capture. To assist in negotiating the lower ransom, the owners engaged a team that were experienced in this course of action and, in doing so, incurred an

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from