Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2011

Liquidated Damages Clause v Penalty Clause

Court upholds onerous liquidated damages clause triggered by termination of a yacht building contract.

United KingdomTransport
Gordon Campbell
Gordon Campbell

Court upholds onerous liquidated damages clause triggered by termination of a yacht building contract.

Buyer beware – on the facts, a clause entitling a yacht builder to liquidated damages of 20 per cent of the contract price in the event of termination of the contract was "not even arguably" a penalty clause.1

The claimant, Azimut-Benetti SpA ("Azimut"), was commissioned by Shoreacres Ltd ("Shoreacres") to construct a 60-metre motor yacht. The contract price – EUR 38 million – was payable in instalments, and Shoreacres' obligation to pay was personally guaranteed by its owner, Mr Darrell Healey.

Clause 16 of the contract gave Azimut a right to terminate in the event that Shoreacres failed to pay "any sum due and owing ... within 45 days after the due date". Clause 16 further provided that, in the event of lawful termination, Azimut would be entitled to retain and/or recover an amount equal to 20 per cent of the contract price "by way of liquidated damages as

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from