Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2009

Jurisdiction For Claims Under The Passenger Rights Regulation

Rehder v Air Baltic (Judgment of the European Court of Justice, 9 July 2009 Case C-204/08).

United KingdomTransport
Tina Collier
Tina Collier

Rehder v Air Baltic (Judgment of the European Court of Justice, 9 July 2009 Case C-204/08).

Mr Rehder bought a return flight with Air Baltic (the registered office of which is in Riga, Latvia) for travel from Germany to Lithuania (Munich-Vilnius-Munich). Thirty minutes before departure of the outbound flight from Munich, passengers were informed that the flight had been cancelled. Mr Rehder brought a claim in the German court having jurisdiction over Munich airport (Amtsgericht Erding) seeking €250 compensation under the cancellation provisions (Articles 5(1)(c) and 7(1)(a)) of the Passenger Rights Regulation.

The EC Judgments Regulation Regulation

(EC) No 44/2001 lays down rules governing the jurisdiction of the courts and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters in the member states of the EU. The objective of the regulation is to harmonise and make predictable such rules. With respect to jurisdiction, the basic principle

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from