Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2015

General Average – Dealing With The Costs Of A Hijacking

The recent judgment in the Longchamp has overturned accepted industry thinking in how bunkers and crew wages are dealt with in a hijacking.

United KingdomTransport

Mitsui & Co Ltd & others v. Beteiligungsgesellschaft LPG Tankerflotte MBH & Co KG (Longchamp) [2014] EWHC 3445

The recent judgment in the Longchamp has overturned accepted industry thinking in how bunkers and crew wages are dealt with in a hijacking. Not only has it wrong-footed lawyers, but it flies in the face of the written and considered views of the Advisory Committee of the Association of Average Adjustors and opens up interesting questions on other heads of claim not considered in the judgment.

The Judge was asked to consider whether a number of items (familiar to anyone who has dealt with a Somali hijacking case) were recoverable in General Average ("GA"). These included: media response services, crew wages, bunkers and telephone charges. The hijacking took place in January 2009, lasted just under two months and resulted in a ransom of US$1,850,000. The total amount of expenses in issue was a modest US$181,604, reflecting the short duration of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from