Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2015

Extending Time For Performance? Consider The Markets!

This was a dispute arising out of a contract of affreightment. The Court awarded the Owners damages for breach of the COA.

United KingdomTransport

Swissmarine Services SA v. Gupta Coal India Private Limited [2015] EWHC 265 (Comm)

This was a dispute arising out of a contract of affreightment ("COA"). The Court awarded the Owners damages for breach of the COA. These, however, were calculated by reference to prevailing market rates on the last date on which, by virtue of the Owners' indulgence, the non-performing Charterers could have performed, rather than by reference to the prevailing rates at the times that the voyages should originally have been performed.

The background facts

The COA was for six shipments of coal from Richards Bay to India. Two shipments were to be spread in 2011 and four in 2012.

The Charterers made the first two nominations under the COA but, by February 2012, were having difficulties in despatching the cargo from the discharge port. The Owners took the position that they expected the Charterers to perform and that they would take legal action if the contract was breached.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from