Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2012

Arbitration Tribunal Decides Deadfreight And Despatch Claims

The disputes in this arbitration related to claims for deadfreight and despatch under a voyage charterparty for the carriage of iron ore.

United KingdomTransport

London Arbitration 2/12, LMLN 3 August 2012

The disputes in this arbitration related to claims for deadfreight and despatch under a voyage charterparty for the carriage of iron ore.

The background facts and the tribunal's decision

Owners' claim for deadfreight

The cargo was defined in the charterparty as "46,000MT MOLOO [More or Less at Owners' Option] 10% IRON ORE IN BULK". It was further provided that "Chartrs confirm min draught of 11.4m SWAD plus tide in the loading port".

An owner is entitled to deadfreight if the charterer fails to load the full amount of cargo which he has agreed to supply under the terms of the charterparty. Here, the deadfreight claim arose from the fact that when the vessel arrived, the maximum allowable draught at the berth was 11.19 metres: less than the minimum draught warranted by the charterers. Therefore, the vessel could only load 46,000.787mt of iron ore. As the charterers had agreed under the charterparty to load up to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from