Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2026

LEGO A/S v. EUIPO – Round 2 – Who Is The Informed User?

Boult Wade Tennant LLP
Boult Wade Tennant LLP
Contributor
Boult Wade Tennant LLP

Boult Wade Tennant LLP

Boult is a top-tier European firm specializing in IP advice and solutions for both domestic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Boult Wade Tennant LLP

I have written previously an article about the difficulties Lego has faced in securing Registered European Union Designs (REUDs) before the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

United KingdomStrategy

I have written previously an article about the difficulties Lego has faced in securing Registered European Union Designs (REUDs) before the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). As noted in that article, I am a self-confessed Adult Fan of Lego, with a collection that has grown to an unsustainable size in our current house.

Against that background, I was particularly interested to see the decision at the start of 2026 in T‑628/24 from the General Court. Lego had applied to annul a decision of the EUIPO Board of Appeal (Case R 162/2023-3), which had revoked Lego's REUD 001050645-0003.

The contested Registered EU Design
The REUD in issue relates to a specific Lego part described, using Lego's well-established taxonomy, as a "Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with Clip on End (Horizontal Grip)". For readers whose Lego experience may not have extended beyond childhood, this terminology warrants some explanation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from