Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2005

Clarification on Employee Stress and Collective Consultation

The Court of Appeal and EAT have respectively clarified the position for employers dealing with (i) employee workplace stress and (ii) collective redundancies. The decisions do not alter current law, but provide helpful guidance for employers dealing with these two difficult situations.

United KingdomStrategy

Court of Appeal and EAT guidance

The Court of Appeal and EAT have respectively clarified the position for employers dealing with (i) employee workplace stress and (ii) collective redundancies. The decisions do not alter current law, but provide helpful guidance for employers dealing with these two difficult situations.

Stress at work - how should and employer respond?

In the case of Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust the Court of Appeal considered a number of cases relating to stress at work. The CA confirmed some established principles:

  • if an employer does not act on information that an employee is depressed at work, then it may be liable for the psychiatric injury suffered;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from