Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2013

Where Settlements Lead To Disputes

The usual expectation when parties enter into a settlement agreement is that it will resolve disputes between them rather than trigger them.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The usual expectation when parties enter into a settlement agreement is that it will resolve disputes between them rather than trigger them.  However, there have been a number of cases where this has not happened.  Most recently, Interserve Industrial Services Limited v ZRE Katowice [2012] EWHC 3205 (TCC).

Interserve and ZRE entered into subcontracts for scaffolding and insulation at a power station in Pembrokeshire.

The subcontract contained dispute resolution provisions which provided that final settlement of disputes was to be by Arbitration. 

Disputes arose regarding Interserve's entitlement to interim payments.  These were resolved and documented in a Settlement Agreement.  It set out provisions for payment of the "Outstanding Sum" on achievement of milestones.  It confirmed that  any other amounts becoming due  would be dealt with in accordance with the subcontract.  The Agreement was said to be governed by the laws of England and Wales and the courts of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from