Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JULY 2025

When Less Is Still Enough: TCC Confirms Validity Of Interim Payment Application

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

In 1st Formations Limited v Lapp Industries Ltd, the Technology and Construction Court held that an interim payment application was valid despite the opposing arguments that the notice did not comply...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In 1st Formations Limited v Lapp Industries Ltd, the Technology and Construction Courtheld that an interim payment application was valid despite the opposing arguments that the notice did not comply with Paragraph 2 of the Scheme for Construction Contracts 1998 as amended, it was ambiguous, and it also concerned incorrect dates and provisional sums.

Background

In 2022 1st Formations Limited (Formations) engaged Lapp Industries Ltd (Lapp) to carry out refurbishment works at an office in London. The contract did not detail any payment terms as required by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the Act), so Paragraph 2 of the Scheme for Construction Contracts 1998 as amended (the Scheme) provided the implied terms that would govern payment under the contract.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from