Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2007

The JCT Major Projects Form - Risks, Responsibilities and Contractor Freedom

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

Little has been written about the Major Projects Form ("MPF") which has been with the industry for the best part of 5 years. However take up is beginning slowly so perhaps it is time to dust off your prep notes.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Little has been written about the Major Projects Form ("MPF") which has been with the industry for the best part of 5 years. However take up is beginning slowly so perhaps it is time to dust off your prep notes.

Guidance note

The JCT has published a 24 page set of Guidance Notes for use with the MPF. Whilst, this appears partly to contradict the aim of producing a shorter and simpler contract which should be sufficiently self explanatory, the MPF remains considerably shorter than any of its contemporary JCT contracts. For example it is 80% smaller than the 1998 With Contractor’s Design contract.

The JCT warns in its Guidance Notes that the form of contract is not for everyone. They say it is designed for use by experienced Employers who require limited procedural provisions in the contract form and have their own sophisticated in-house procedures and protocols and Contractors with whom they regularly work. Also, given the fact that under this new form of contract the Contractor

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from