Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2006

The JCT 2005 Standard Forms of Construction Contract

The JCT’s introduction of the 2005 suite of standard form construction contracts is certainly more than just a "facelifting" exercise. Not only have the 2005 forms been redrafted using less legalistic language and sorted into a more user-friendly format, important developments have also been incorporated, triggered by changes in both the industry and the law.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Philip Boulding KC MA LL.B (Cantab)
Philip Boulding KC MA LL.B (Cantab)
Matthew Holt
Matthew Holt
Calum Lamont
Calum Lamont

Introduction

  • The JCT’s introduction of the 2005 suite of standard form construction contracts is certainly more than just a "facelifting" exercise. Not only have the 2005 forms been redrafted using less legalistic language and sorted into a more user-friendly format, important developments have also been incorporated, triggered by changes in both the industry and the law.

  • Space and time prevent an exhaustive analysis of all such developments. Instead, the focus of this talk will be on four key areas in which the most striking changes appear to have been made, namely:

    (I) Layout and Structure of the 2005 forms

    1. The drafting of the 2005 forms has been heavily influenced by a search for uniformity and modernisation (probably influenced by the fact that they are newly published by Sweet & Maxwell). This has manifested itself in several different ways.

  • We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

    See more popular content from