Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2018

SPG Found Inconsistent With The London Plan

Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Contributor
Mishcon de Reya LLP

Mishcon de Reya LLP

Founded by Lord Mishcon in 1937, in a one-room office in Brixton, Mishcon de Reya now employs over...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mishcon de Reya LLP

Both sides claimed victory with the judgment in the challenge by retirement housing developers (McCarthy & Stone, Churchill Retirement Living, Renaissance Retirement and PegasusLife) ...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Both sides claimed victory with the judgment in the challenge by retirement housing developers (McCarthy & Stone, Churchill Retirement Living, Renaissance Retirement and PegasusLife) and the Mayor over his Affordable Housing and Viability Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG).  Now that the PR teams have moved on, who was actually right?

Judgment was handed down on 23 May 2018 which upheld in part the housebuilders' claim that the SPG is inconsistent with the London Plan but dismissed claims that there was a need for a Strategic Environmental Assessment and that the SPG was discriminatory against the elderly.  Declaratory relief has since been granted confirming the SPG's inconsistency with the London Plan in relation to late stage viability reviews for single phase schemes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from