Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MAY 2014

Singh V Dhanji (Consent To Alienation)

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

The Court of Appeal recently considered an appeal from a claim against a landlord for damages for breach of his statutory duty.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The Court of Appeal recently considered an appeal from a claim against a landlord for damages for breach of his statutory duty arising out of his refusal to consent to the assignment of a lease of dental premises in Nottingham: Singh v Dhanji and Dhanji [2014] EWCA Civ 414. The Trial Judge had granted a declaration that the landlord's conditions for permitting the tenant to assign the lease were unreasonable and awarded the tenant damages of £183,000 plus interest of £31,000.

The Facts

The landlord let the premises for a 15 year term from 10 March 2000. A number of disputes had arisen between the parties prior to this one, including a claim by the tenant for breach of warranty in relation to the sale. In addition, rent had not been paid by the tenant for more than a year because the landlord had closed the account to which the rent was to be paid. The landlord then forfeited the lease by peaceably re-entering the property in the evening, changing the locks and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from