Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2008

Shop Fronts And Servitudes

The recent decision in Romano v Standard Commercial Property Securities Ltd and Another revisits the possibility of recognising new servitudes that was the subject of last years House of Lords decision in Moncrieff v Jamieson.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Craig Blackwood
Craig Blackwood

The recent decision in Romano v Standard Commercial Property Securities Ltd and Another revisits the possibility of recognising new servitudes that was the subject of last year's House of Lords decision in Moncrieff v Jamieson.

In Romano, the owner of a shop fronting onto Buchanan Street in Glasgow sought a court order declaring that he had a servitude right to attach a shop front and fascia onto the external wall which was owned in common by all the proprietors of the building.

There was a Compulsory Purchase Order procedure underway and there was a discussion of whether this would undermine the action as the Lands Tribunal could decide in due course whether a servitude existed and what its value might be. The Court dismissed this argument – the fact that the servitude may or may not be considered by the Lands Tribunal did not affect the present action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from