Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2012

Payment Terms Under NEC3

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

In the Scottish case of SGL Carbon Fibres Ltd v RBG Ltd, [2012] CSOH 19, Lord Glennie dismissed an appeal by the employer against an arbitrator’s decision. The court, in agreement with the arbitrator, found that an employer bore the burden of proof when seeking to recover alleged overpayments to a contractor under a NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In the Scottish case of SGL Carbon Fibres Ltd v RBG Ltd, [2012] CSOH 19, Lord Glennie dismissed an appeal by the employer against an arbitrator's decision. The court, in agreement with the arbitrator, found that an employer bore the burden of proof when seeking to recover alleged overpayments to a contractor under a NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract.

The Facts

  • SGL Carbon Fibres Limited engaged RGB Ltd under an amended NEC3 Engineering and Construction Contract (June 2005, with Options C and W2) to carry out engineering works at SGL's premises.
  • During the course of the project, the parties departed from the NEC3 contractual payment mechanism and instead used a process by which the employer's quantity surveyor, rather than the project manager as provided for in clause 50.1, would approve the amount that the contractor intended to claim before the latter submitted its monthly application for interim payment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from