Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2013

If Others Are Doing It, Does That Make It Ok

It is not surprising to see a number of lenders raising court actions against surveyors in order to try to recover losses which they claim to have suffered as a result of the negligent over-valuation of properties used as security for loans.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In the current economic climate, it is not surprising to see a number of lenders raising court actions against surveyors in order to try to recover losses which they claim to have suffered as a result of the negligent over-valuation of properties used as security for loans. In December 2012, Coulson J handed down his decisions in Webb Resolutions Limited v E.Surv Limited and Blemain Finance Limited v E.Surv Limited. This provided useful reminders in relation to the permissible margin of error and issues of contributory negligence. 

Background

Webb concerned the valuation of two properties for two separate borrowers, Mr Ali and Mr Bradley, which would act as security for loans advanced. Mr Ali purchased a 2 bedroom flat in Birmingham, which E.Surv valued at £227,995. Mr Bradley sought a remortgage of his property in Whitstable, Kent, which E.Surv valued at £295,000. The correct valuations of the properties should have been £204,658 and £260,000 respectively.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from