Last year, a legislative amendment designed to solve an anomaly whereby tenants with unprotected, or minor, tenancies receive less ‘disturbance' compensation under a CPO than either licensees or tenants with protected tenancies has, for HS2 compensation claimants, ended up creating a two-tier compensation system.
United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Last year, a legislative amendment designed to solve an anomaly
whereby tenants with unprotected, or minor, tenancies receive less
'disturbance' compensation under a CPO than either
licensees or tenants with protected tenancies has, for HS2
compensation claimants, ended up creating a two-tier compensation
system. The change, effective from 22 September 2017, is not
retrospective which means that the compensation claims of tenants
affected by Phase 1 of HS2 (which has already had CPO powers
granted by Royal Assent) and those who are affected by Phase 2
(which has not) will be treated differently.
Principle assumes landlords would terminate lease at first
opportunity
The original anomaly dates back to the 1960s when a case,
Bishopsgate Space Management Ltd v London Underground Limited, led
to a decision which became known as the Bishopsgate Principle. This
rested on the assumption that a landlord would terminate a lease at
the first possible opportunity, regardless
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
View source