Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 DECEMBER 2024

Design Responsibility: The Need For Clarity

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contributor
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

UK 2026 Chambers Firm Profile Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) is an international, fully...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

The case of *Workman Properties Ltd v Adi Building & Refurbishment Ltd* highlights the importance of ensuring contract terms reflect parties' agreements, especially when modifying JCT Design and Build provisions.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Summary

In this Insight, Shy Jackson and Rebecca Maxwell consider what we can learn from the case of Workman Properties Ltd v Adi Building & Refurbishment Ltd [2024] EWHC 2627 (TCC) which provides a salient reminder of the importance of making sure the contract reflects the terms of the parties' agreement.

The recent case of Workman Properties Ltd v Adi Building & Refurbishment Ltd [2024] EWHC 2627 (TCC) provides a salient reminder of the importance of making sure the contract reflects the terms of the parties' agreement, especially when amending the standard JCT Design and Build provisions. It also provides useful guidance on the use of Part 8 proceedings for declarations relating to adjudication.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from