Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 APRIL 2024

Defective Premises Act 1972: Lessons From Recent Case Law On Defects Claims

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In Vainker & Anor v Marbank Construction Ltd & Ors [2024], the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) found the defendants liable under the Defective Premises Act 1972...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In Vainker & Anor v Marbank Construction Ltd & Ors [2024], the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) found the defendants liable under the Defective Premises Act 1972 (DPA) in respect of certain defects at a residential property.

In reaching her decision, Mrs Justice Jefford DBE made a number of observations about factors that will be relevant when seeking to establish a breach of the duty in section 1 of the DPA. She also provided welcome judicial guidance on the question: can a net contribution clause be relied upon in respect of liability under the DPA?

Background facts

The claimants, Mr. and Mrs Vainker, had engaged SCd (the architect) to design and Marbank (the contractor) to construct a residential property in Twickenham. The claimants commenced proceedings in May 2020, alleging multiple defects in the property.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from