Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2011

Construction Bites: Adjudicators' Conduct - Limits Of Discretion

Burness Paull LLP
Burness Paull LLP
Contributor
Burness Paull LLP

Burness Paull LLP

Proudly based in Scotland, Burness Paull is a full-service, independent law firm working with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Burness Paull LLP

Under section 108 (2) of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act (HGCRA), a construction contract has to allow an adjudicator to take the initiative in ascertaining the facts and the law.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Colin Clelland
Colin Clelland

Under section 108 (2) of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act (HGCRA), a construction contract has to allow an adjudicator to take the initiative in ascertaining the facts and the law. Over the years, there have been a number of cases that explore the extent to which an adjudicator can use this power without breaching the rules of natural justice.

This and one other issue of interest was considered in the recent Outer House decision of SGL Carbon Fibres Limited v RBG Limited 2011. That other issue of interest concerns the question as to whether an adjudicator is bound by a previous decision that has been held by the Courts to be unenforceable but has not been formally reduced by way of judicial review proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from