Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2011

Construction Adjudication: Breach Of Natural Justice

"It is only too easy in a complex case for a party to comb through the adjudicator’s reasons and identify points upon which to present a challenge under the labels "excess of jurisdiction" or "breach of natural justice".

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Henry Sherman
Henry Sherman

"It is only too easy in a complex case for a party to comb through the adjudicator's reasons and identify points upon which to present a challenge under the labels "excess of jurisdiction" or "breach of natural justice". So said Chadwick LJ in Carillion v Devonport [2005] EWCA Civ 1358. On the other hand, "save in the plainest cases" the judge went on, such a challenge "is likely to lead to a substantial waste of time and expense".

A recent decision of the Scottish courts, again involving a Carillion company (against SP Power Systems), may encourage parties considering such a move to feel that the odds are now rather more in their favour.

Background

The case was one of two which were concerned with a dispute as to how works carried out by Carillion under a utilities framework agreement should be valued. The dispute was referred to adjudication and the adjudicator decided that nearly £3 million was due to Carillion. SP refused to pay and resisted enforcement on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from