Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2010

Builders And Economic Loss

Does a building contractor owe his client a concurrent duty of care in tort and in contract in relation to economic loss? This age-old question was recently addressed by the Manchester TCC in Robinson v P.E. Jones (Contractors).

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Nadia Lucherini
Nadia Lucherini
Peter Mansfield
Peter Mansfield
Giles Tagg
Giles Tagg

Does a building contractor owe his client a concurrent duty of care in tort and in contract in relation to economic loss? This age-old question was recently addressed by the Manchester TCC in Robinson v P.E. Jones (Contractors). The decision is likely to be of interest to builders as it clarifies the extent of their exposure to claims.

In 1991, P E Jones entered into an agreement with Mr Robinson whereby P E Jones would build and sell him a house. The house featured gas fires in two rooms which were served by chimney flues that P E Jones constructed. In 2006, two years after the gas fires failed a safety test, Mr Robinson started proceedings against P E Jones, claiming that the chimney flues had not been constructed properly.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from