Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2012

The Times They Are A-Changing…Back?

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Just when cheating celebrities thought it was safe to go back into the water, the tabloids have tried to put the privacy clock back.

United KingdomPrivacy

Just when cheating celebrities thought it was safe to go back into the water and get drenched to the bone, frolicking in villa side pools in Tuscany or beaches in the Seychelles, the tabloids have tried to put the privacy clock back and show that they continue to mean business prior to the publication of Lord Leveson's findings.

TV presenters and other public figures, some of whom who have obtained privacy injunctions in the past, had hoped that the PCC Code of Practice and OFCOM privacy rules might have given them freedom to let their hair down with members of the other opposite sex without the risk of public scrutiny but, bizarrely, the tabloids are have been hitting back with privacy injunctions (sometimes called super injunctions) in full retreat and kiss n' tells, or at least celebrity surveillance, back in fashion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from