Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2012

Logos And No-Gos: Personal Or Commercial?

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

The Supreme Court, in Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28, rules on the scope of privilege against self-incrimination.

United KingdomPrivacy
Geoff Steward
Geoff Steward

The Supreme Court, in Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28, rules on the scope of privilege against self-incrimination.

Glenn Mulcaire has remained at the forefront of the "phone-hacking" scandal and last month lost his appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the interception of client voicemail messages left on the mobile phone of Nicola Phillips, PA to the PR consultant Max Clifford.

The Supreme Court dismissed Mr Mulcaire's appeal from the Court of Appeal and held that he could not rely on the common law privilege against self-incrimination as a defence to an application by Ms Phillips for an order requiring Mr Mulcaire to disclose who instructed him to intercept the voice messages and the nature of the interception.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from