Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2010

‘Proof by Case Management’ and Other Myths about the Criminal Procedure Rules

It is clear that the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules (‘the Rules’) has had a significant impact on criminal litigation.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The age of ambush may be over, but the principle remains that the prosecution must always prove its case.

It is clear that the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules ('the Rules') has had a significant impact on criminal litigation. Of particular significance is the duty on the defence to assist the court in identifying the issues in the case. Case law from the Divisional Court has held that the defence may no longer gain advantage by raising issues at the last minute. As noted by His Honour Judge Denyer Q.C., it is fair to say that we have reached the 'end of the ambush'.1

It is tempting, however, to exaggerate the effect of the changes. The experience of practitioners suggests that the changes, as significant as they have undoubtedly been, are being overstated by prosecutors in the Magistrates' Court. In particular, prosecutors are attempting to use the Rules and the associated case law to lighten the burden borne by the prosecution to prove its case. They

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from