Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 SEPTEMBER 2026

Time Limits For Challenging Arbitral Awards: What E v F Confirms About Late Amendments

The Commercial Court's decision in E v F confirms that filing a challenge to an arbitral award within the statutory 28-day window does not permit parties to substantially amend that challenge months later. When a State attempted to amend its challenge 162 days after the award was issued, the court refused permission, emphasizing that the strict time limits apply equally to amendments as to original challenges.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key takeaway

The Commercial Court's decision in E v F [2026] EWHC 1493 (Comm) confirms that a party who challenges an arbitral award within the statutory 28-day window does not buy itself a longer runway to amend that challenge later. In E v F, an amendment application brought 162 days after the award, more than five times the statutory deadline, was refused, even though the amendment did not raise a new ground of challenge and even though the original challenge had been filed in time. The message is clear: get the challenge right the first time.

What happened in E v F?

The case concerned a State's challenge to an award made against it in an investment treaty arbitration. The award was issued on 31 July 2025. The State brought proceedings under sections 67 and 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 on 27 August 2025, comfortably within the 28-day period set by section 70 of the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from