Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2025

The Liberalisation Of Champerty? Not Quite.

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

A look at the court's application of the doctrine of Champerty in light of the recent case Tactus Holdings Limited (in admin) v Philip Mark Jordan.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A look at the court's application of the doctrine of Champerty in light of the recent case Tactus Holdings Limited (in admin) v Philip Mark Jordan.

In a rare decision on the law of champerty, the High Court has recently handed down judgment inTactus Holdings Limited (in admin) v Philip Mark Jordan,considering whether an attempt to assign a claim for breach of warranties by the contractual party to another party is contrary to public policy. 

The facts

Tactus Holdings Limited (“Tactus”) commenced proceedings for breach of warranty under a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) against the sellers, under the SPA in March 2023, claiming approximately £18 million. The sellers (the “Defendants”) counterclaimed for moneys due under the SPA, claiming approximately £4.3 million.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from