Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Sports Arbitration Handy Guide - 7 Cases On Challenges To Jurisdiction

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

In this article, Alejandro Coghill and Matt Phillip, look back at seven cases that challenged jurisdiction in sports arbitration and identify nine key takeaways.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In this article, Alejandro Coghill and Matt Phillip, look back at seven cases that challenged jurisdiction in sports arbitration and identify nine key takeaways.

For many years, the Court of Arbitration for Sport ("CAS") has been recognised as the preeminent forum for the resolution of sports disputes. However, the recent decision in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Semenya v Switzerland, is the latest example of athletes seeking to challenge that status. Semenya was successful before the ECtHR, but Switzerland may still appeal the decision. This article highlights some key cases that challenged jurisdiction in sports arbitration and identify nine key takeaways.

1. Mutu and Pechstein v Switzerland

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from