Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2018

Reporting Restrictions On Court Proceedings

Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Contributor
Mishcon de Reya LLP

Mishcon de Reya LLP

Founded by Lord Mishcon in 1937, in a one-room office in Brixton, Mishcon de Reya now employs over...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mishcon de Reya LLP

Two recent cases confirm that reporting restrictions on court proceedings will only be imposed as a measure of last resort.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Two recent cases confirm that reporting restrictions on court proceedings will only be imposed as a measure of last resort.

In line with the core principle of open justice, the general rule is that justice should be administered in public: proceedings must be held in public, evidence must be communicated publicly, and the Court should not prevent the fair, accurate and contemporaneous reporting of proceedings by the media unless strictly necessary. As to reporting, there are important statutory (automatic) restrictions; for example, victims of a wide range of sexual offences have lifetime anonymity under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992. The Court can also impose a discretionary reporting restriction, including under section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, which allows for the postponement of reporting in order to avoid a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice. The onus is on the party seeking the restriction to show that a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from