Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2021

R (KBR Inc) V SFO: A Victory For Common Sense

BCL Solicitors LLP
BCL Solicitors LLP
Contributor
BCL Solicitors LLP

BCL Solicitors LLP

BCL Solicitors is a market leading firm specialising in domestic and international corporate and...

View firm profile
Explore more from BCL Solicitors LLP

In October 2020 the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (KBR Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (see previous summary article [insert link]).

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In October 2020 the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (KBR Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (see previous summary article [insert link]). The appeal focussed on whether the SFO could issue a notice under section 2(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 ("the CJA 1987") to a foreign company requiring it to produce documents held abroad ("the s2 Notice"). The Supreme Court has now ruled that a SFO s2 Notice does not have extraterritorial effect in what many practitioners and commentators will welcome as a victory for common sense and respect for the comity of nations. That is an entirely unsurprising result given the well-established position generally limiting to the UK the application of legislation emanating from the UK Parliament.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from