Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 OCTOBER 2009

Protective Costs Orders Approved By The House Of Lords

Duncan Lewis Solicitors
Duncan Lewis Solicitors
Contributor
Duncan Lewis Solicitors

Duncan Lewis Solicitors

Duncan Lewis Solicitors is an acclaimed law firm headquartered in the City of London and proudly...

View firm profile
Explore more from Duncan Lewis Solicitors

Protective Costs Orders are something of a constitutional novelty, and the principles that govern their award, their ambit and even their very existence have been controversial. However the House of Lords have recently implicitly approved their status – and they may be available even where the applicant has a private interest in the outcome.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
James Packer
James Packer

Protective Costs Orders are something of a constitutional novelty, and the principles that govern their award, their ambit and even their very existence have been controversial. However the House of Lords have recently implicitly approved their status – and they may be available even where the applicant has a private interest in the outcome.

Public Interest v Private Interest - MO(Nigeria) Part II

It is a notorious fact that extensive litigation is generally a privilege extended to the rich or the penurious, but likely to be beyond the means of the public at large. The introduction of Conditional Fee Arrangements (CFAs) has gone some way to address this point, but glaring gaps remain. In particular, even with a CFA a litigant is at risk of an adverse costs order. Normally of course the litigant will seek the security of after the event (ATE) insurance to cover an award against him, but these are provided by the private sector and they are understandably nervous of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from