Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2026

Protecting A Performance Bond: Lessons From CR Construction UK V Barclays Bank Plc

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contributor
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

UK 2026 Chambers Firm Profile Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) is an international, fully...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

In this Insight, Marcus Birch considers the case of CR Construction (UK) Limited v Barclays Bank plc [2026] EWHC 202 (TCC) which concerned an unsuccessful application by a contractor for an injunction restraining...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Summary

In this Insight, Marcus Birch considers the case of CR Construction (UK) Limited v Barclays Bank plc [2026] EWHC 202 (TCC) which concerned an unsuccessful application by a contractor for an injunction restraining the bank which issued its performance bond from paying out under a demand made by the employer. 

CR Construction (UK) Limited v Barclays Bank plc [2026] EWHC 202 (TCC) concerned an unsuccessful application by a contractor for an injunction restraining the bank which issued its performance bond from paying out under a demand made by the employer. It is a straightforward application of the normal principles laid down in previous cases, from Edward Owen Engineering Ltd v Barclays Bank International Ltd [1978] 1 All ER 976, through Simon Carves Ltd v Ensus UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 657 and on to more recent cases such as Shapoorji Pallonji and Co Private Ltd v Yumn Ltd [2021] EWHC 862 (Comm).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from