Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2017

Professional Advice Can Be Taxing - Don't Sweat It

When a professional provides negligent advice they may be liable for consequent loss. But is the professional liable for the distress caused by their negligent advice?

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

When a professional provides negligent advice they may be liable for consequent loss. But is the professional liable for the distress caused by their negligent advice? Clark v Turnbull [2017] CSOH 4 says that they're not. Distress is only a valid head of claim where the purpose of a contract was to provide pleasure or peace of mind.

The pursuers in this case are brothers. They sought the advice of the defenders, a firm of chartered accountants, on their capital gains tax liabilities arising from the sale of flats. They were incorrectly advised the CGT would be between £40,000 and £50,000. They sold the flats. In fact the CGT liability was around £150,000.

The brothers sought damages for the losses suffered. This included the increased CGT incurred; transaction fees; and late payment surcharges. They also sought damages for the distress they suffered when they discovered they faced a larger tax bill.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from