Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2018

Perkins Engines V Ghaddar [2018] EWHC 1500 (Comm)

Judge interprets meaning of "reciprocal enforcement procedures" in an arbitration agreement

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judge interprets meaning of "reciprocal enforcement procedures" in an arbitration agreement

The applicant sought an anti-suit injunction in respect of proceedings commenced by the respondent in Lebanon, which it was alleged breached the arbitration agreement entered into between the parties. The relevant arbitration agreement provided that the parties would arbitrate in London "to the extent there is no reciprocal enforcement procedures between the UK and the country in which the [respondent] is located". The applicant argued that the phrase meant that there had to be a bilateral or multilateral treaty in force between the UK and Lebanon (there is no such treaty in force). The respondent countered that all that was required was that the domestic laws of the two countries permitted mutual enforcement of judgments (e.g. under English common law, and its equivalent in Lebanon).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from