Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2014

Northhampton County Court Discovers A Loophole In Part 36

In this case, Northhampton County Court felt bound to decide that the original acceptance period for a Part 36 offer had expired and was not renewed upon the offer being varied.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Burrett v Mencap Ltd

In this case, Northhampton County Court felt bound to decide that the original acceptance period for a Part 36 offer had expired and was not renewed upon the offer being varied. This decision is surprising, but does appear to be in accordance with the strict letter of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules. In light of this ruling, offerors may wish to consider varying their offers rather than making completely new offers since the latter will trigger a new period for acceptance to run.

A settlement offer in the correct form was served on the claimant, Burrett by the defendant, Mencap, on 19 July 2013, where it lay on the table, neither unaccepted nor withdrawn. On 17 January 2014, Mencap served on Burrett a variation to change the terms of the July 2013 offer. Burrett accepted the varied offer. The issue was whether, in relation to the varied Part 36 offer, the time for acceptance remains 21 days from the date of the original offer or whether a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from