Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2019

Michael Wilson v Emmott: Post Judgment Freezing Orders In The Ordinary Course Of Business

Court of Appeal considers whether payments in the ordinary course of business should be allowed in a post-judgment freezing order

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

[2019] EWCA Civ 219

Court of Appeal considers whether payments in the ordinary course of business should be allowed in a post-judgment freezing order

It is now settled law that a freezing order can be granted post-judgment in aid of execution, even if no freezing order was obtained pre-judgment. As with pre-judgment freezing orders, the purpose is to prevent dissipation of assets. In this case, the appellant appealed the decision at first instance to remove the standard exception in a freezing order which allows the respondent to continue to deal with and dispose of assets "in the ordinary and proper course of business". There was no dispute that the judge had had jurisdiction to remove the exception, and nor was there any challenge to his factual findings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from