Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MAY 2007

Michael Douglas Photo Exclusive And Other Stories

In an important triple judgment, issued on 2 May 2007, the House of Lords has provided welcome clarification of the law relating to tort claims for economic loss caused by intentional acts - also taking the opportunity to extend the law on breach of confidence.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Tim Strong
Tim Strong
Ivan Wilkinson
Ivan Wilkinson

House of Lords re-defines the law on economic torts and commercial confidentiality: OBG v Allan; Douglas v Hello! Limited; and Mainstream v Young (2007).

In an important triple judgment, issued on 2 May 2007, the House of Lords has provided welcome clarification of the law relating to tort claims for economic loss caused by intentional acts - also taking the opportunity to extend the law on breach of confidence.

The judgment covers three separate cases, each of which had raised related issues. The most well-known of these is Douglas and Others v Hello!, where OK! magazine was seeking damages from Hello! magazine for the unauthorised publication of photographs of Michael Douglas’s wedding to Catherine Zeta-Jones. The other two cases were OBG v Allan, relating to losses suffered by the claimant company following the unauthorised appointment of administrative receivers, and Mainstream v Young, where the defendant was alleged to have facilitated breach of contract by two employees of a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from